Professor Sturm locates Emens’ proposal within the context of broader approaches that “encourage institutional redesign as a strategy for achieving… Continue reading →
James F. Blumstein examines Professor Richman’s account under the two different “ways of thinking about the product and the industry—the… Continue reading →
Professor Gardner notes that, though he and Professor Moore agree “that causal wrongs exist,” they “part company [when they] turn… Continue reading →
Professor Bandes notes that when dealing with emotions and public policymaking “[t]he challenge is to encourage the helpful emotions, and… Continue reading →
Professor Huang writes, “A desirable and important feature of viewing emotions as culturally expressive perceptions is that it explicitly acknowledges… Continue reading →
Professor Stocker examines Kahan’s account of the rational weigher, irrational weigher, and cultural evaluator theories and probes for weakness in… Continue reading →
Professor Jackson seeks to tease out the “not inconsiderable challenges” scholars might face in attempting to confirm or rebut Professor… Continue reading →
Professor Tokaji emphasizes three ways in which his approach to election law differs from Professor Elmendorf’s. First, he argues against… Continue reading →
This Response examines Professor Stadler’s argument that “the copyright grant be reformulated to consist of no more than an exclusive… Continue reading →
This Response attempts to explain why Peñalver and Katyal’s “property outlaws” so successfully violate property owners’ exclusion rights when the… Continue reading →