Aggravating Punitive Damages
In Aggravating Punitive Damages, Professor David Owen applauds much of Professor Markel’s vision of how punitive damages law should operate,… Continue reading →
Issue 1
-
-
“Retributive Damages” and the Death of Private Ordering
In “Retributive Damages” and the Death of Private Ordering, Professor Michael Krauss explores the implications of Markel's retributive damages for… Continue reading →
-
Do We Care Enough About Racial Inequality? Reflections on The River Runs Dry
In Do We Care Enough About Racial Inequality? Reflections on The River Runs Dry, Professor Guy-Uriel Charles focuses on the… Continue reading →
-
Doctrinal Dilemma
In Doctrinal Dilemma, Professor Girardeau Spann describes West-Faulcon’s argument as both analytically sound and enticingly clever. The problem, however, is… Continue reading →
-
Panel Effects, Whistleblowing Theory, and the Role of Legal Doctrine
In Panel Effects, Whistleblowing Theory, and the Role of Legal Doctrine, Derek Linkous and Professor Emerson Tiller argue that Kim… Continue reading →
-
Psychology, Strategy, and Behavioral Equivalence
In Psychology, Strategy, and Behavioral Equivalence, Professor Stefanie Lindquist and Dr. Wendy Martinek recognize that Kim has created an innovative… Continue reading →
-
American Corporate Governance Indices as Seen from a European Perspective
In American Corporate Governance Indices as Seen from a European Perspective, Professor Klaus Hopt provides his insights from a continental… Continue reading →
-
Corporate Governance Ratings: One Score, Two Scores, or More?
Professor Vikramaditya Khanna offers his thoughts on Bebchuk and Hamdani’s article in Corporate Governance Ratings: One Score, Two Scores, or… Continue reading →
-
On Addressing Patent Quality
Professor Petherbridge offers his insights in response to the panelists from Addressing Patent Quality: The Theory, Practice, and Implications of… Continue reading →
-
The PTO’s Future: Reform or Abolition?
In PTO’s Future: Reform or Abolition?, Professor Masur responds to the panelists from Intellectual Property Meets Administrative Law: Institutional Reform… Continue reading →