Kavanaugh, Rahimi, and the Effort to Legitimate Originalism
Introduction United States v. Rahimi provides a new sign of whether the current Supreme Court’s conservative majority can be persuaded… Continue reading →
Introduction United States v. Rahimi provides a new sign of whether the current Supreme Court’s conservative majority can be persuaded… Continue reading →
The U.S. Supreme Court is increasingly asserting “history and tradition” as the standard to settle divisive constitutional debates on abortion,… Continue reading →
For nearly two centuries, all three branches of the federal government have thought that the original meaning of the Constitution’s… Continue reading →
Many constitutional rights would be useless if certain conduct ancillary to those rights was not also protected. The Second Amendment… Continue reading →
The Founders were not textualists. The letter of the law mattered quite a bit. But, as William Blackstone noted, interpretation… Continue reading →
Introduction The Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment guarantees that “[i]n all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right… Continue reading →
Is “fear to speak” a cognizable injury in fact under Article III of the U.S. Constitution? Modern standing doctrine provides… Continue reading →
Presidents often develop physical and mental impairments during their tenure in the White House. While certain impairments have a neutral… Continue reading →
For decades, constitutional theory has been haunted by the problem of disagreement: the reality that we are deeply divided on… Continue reading →
Introduction Trump v. United States is a blockbuster decision that has been reviled and celebrated by different quarters of American… Continue reading →