Response

While Professor Garnett generally expresses his appreciation of Tebbe’s “thorough and thoughtful examination . . . of important and difficult… Continue reading →

Professor Minow argues that Emens’ analysis is problematically built out of the view of the individual as “distinctive, alone, and… Continue reading →

Professor Sunstein proposes that the foundations of Emens’ approach can be linked with the notion that “morally irrelevant differences have… Continue reading →

Professor Sturm locates Emens’ proposal within the context of broader approaches that “encourage institutional redesign as a strategy for achieving… Continue reading →

Professor Duff explores the “third and fourth desert bases Moore identifies” and argues “that there is still some room for… Continue reading →

James F. Blumstein examines Professor Richman’s account under the two different “ways of thinking about the product and the industry—the… Continue reading →

Professor Gardner notes that, though he and Professor Moore agree “that causal wrongs exist,” they “part company [when they] turn… Continue reading →

Professor Bandes notes that when dealing with emotions and public policymaking “[t]he challenge is to encourage the helpful emotions, and… Continue reading →

Professor Huang writes, “A desirable and important feature of viewing emotions as culturally expressive perceptions is that it explicitly acknowledges… Continue reading →

Professor Stocker examines Kahan’s account of the rational weigher, irrational weigher, and cultural evaluator theories and probes for weakness in… Continue reading →