In Constitutional Colorblindness and the Family, Katie Eyer brings to our attention an intriguing contradiction in the Supreme Court’s equal… Continue reading →
The U.S. Supreme Court has insisted that standing doctrine is a “bedrock” requirement only of Article III. Accordingly, both jurists… Continue reading →
At one point or another, every law student likely encounters Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife, in which the Supreme Court… Continue reading →
Corporate governance incentives at too-big-to-fail financial firms deserve systematic examination. For industrial conglomerates that have grown too large to be… Continue reading →
Nausea; hives; swelling of eyes, nose, and throat; lung failure; and possibly death—these are the symptoms food allergy sufferers can… Continue reading →
In 2004, Google’s initial public offering (IPO) revealed that the company would go public with a dual-class capitalization structure. A… Continue reading →
I was pleased when I saw that the University of Pennsylvania Law Review had published a new article on terrorism… Continue reading →
Cyberattacks are inevitable and widespread. Existing scholarship on cyberespionage and cyberwar is undermined by its futile obsession with preventing attacks.… Continue reading →
It has been over a hundred years since George Bernard Shaw wrote that “[a]ll professions are a conspiracy against the… Continue reading →
What good is Article V? The Constitution’s amendment rule renders the text inflexible, countermajoritarian, and insensitive to important contemporary constituencies.… Continue reading →