2007

Professor Underkuffler agrees with Peñalver and Katyal that, in a system which disfavors property violations, it is critical to “distinguish… Continue reading →

This response picks up on one of Professor Wright’s key findings: “the curious fact that the rate of acquittals in… Continue reading →

This response questions whether trial distortion represents a significant problem. Professor O’Hear believes our main focus should be on “mak[ing]… Continue reading →

Professor Richman applauds Professor Wright for attempting to determine whether “the inexorable reduction in trials actually reflects an impairment of… Continue reading →

Professor Bagenstos that while Professor Colker’s arguments are compelling, “[h]er article fails to establish that the IDEA’s individualized integration presumption… Continue reading →

Professor Hills praises Professor Williams for recognizing that “whatever the merits of [the departmentalist and judicial supremacist] positions as interpretations… Continue reading →

Professor Weber applauds Professor Colker for attempting to look at the integration presumption in a new way, but worries that… Continue reading →

This response argues that the proposals in Geistfeld’s “provocative and insightful” article may be too far-reaching, and specifically contends that… Continue reading →

David D. Meyer praises Rosenbury for “calling attention to the lack of scholarship addressing the childrearing that takes place” outside… Continue reading →

Paul E. McGreal responds to both Gil Seinfeld’s original article and Trevor W. Morrison’s response, Complete Preemption and the Separation… Continue reading →