Which Evidence Law? A Response to Schauer
As usual, Frederick Schauer raises profound issues in his insightful essay, On the Supposed Jury-Dependence of Evidence Law. Schauer is… Continue reading →
2006
-
-
-
Rehnquist to Roberts: The "Reagan Revolution" Fulfilled?
Exactly one week before Chief Justice Warren E. Burger’s retirement was publicly announced (the White House knew in advance of… Continue reading →
-
A Feeling of Unease About Privacy Law
This essay responds to Daniel Solove’s recent article, A Taxonomy of Privacy. I have read many of Daniel Solove’s privacy-related… Continue reading →
-
Connectedness and its Discontents
Connectedness is actually a quandary. Often assumed to be a better state of affairs than being disconnected, the state of… Continue reading →
-
Principles in Practice: "Unstuck" or Sticky?
In previous writings, Professors Balkin and Siegel (the authors), both together and separately, have made major contributions to the scholarly… Continue reading →
-
The Obviousness Requirement in the Patent Law
In this debate, Professor R. Polk Wagner, of Penn, and Professor Katherine J. Strandburg, of DePaul University College of Law,… Continue reading →
-
Social Movements Everywhere
Just five years ago—in the pages of this law review—Reva Siegel wrote an essay characterizing her focus on social movements… Continue reading →
-
What is Rehnquist Federalism?
The federalism arena is worth close attention, as it is often thought that the Rehnquist Court radically altered the law… Continue reading →
-
Is the United Nations Still Relevant?
The relevance of the United Nations (UN) to the development of international law and to international security remains vigorously contested.… Continue reading →