"Excluding Religion": A Response
While Professor Garnett generally expresses his appreciation of Tebbe’s “thorough and thoughtful examination . . . of important and difficult… Continue reading →
While Professor Garnett generally expresses his appreciation of Tebbe’s “thorough and thoughtful examination . . . of important and difficult… Continue reading →
Professor Smith argues more generally that, when it comes to the Religion Clause, “there just is not much to say… Continue reading →
Professor Bibas argues that the false guilty pleas championed in Bowers’ article would serve to undermine “the public faith and… Continue reading →
Professor Thomas proposes an even more radical change of our system that that presented by Bowers’ article—where specially-appointed magistrates, deemed… Continue reading →
Professor Wright believes that, instead of viewing “defendants” and “prosecutors” as parts of one global market, it would do better… Continue reading →
Professor Sunstein proposes that the foundations of Emens’ approach can be linked with the notion that “morally irrelevant differences have… Continue reading →
Professor Sturm locates Emens’ proposal within the context of broader approaches that “encourage institutional redesign as a strategy for achieving… Continue reading →
From way down in the dirty depths, where those of us who collect empirical data dwell unobserved and largely ignored… Continue reading →