Making Sense of Immigration Law
In Making Sense of Immigration Law, Professor Cox continues his argument from Immigration Law's Organizing Principles that the distinction between… Continue reading →
In Making Sense of Immigration Law, Professor Cox continues his argument from Immigration Law's Organizing Principles that the distinction between… Continue reading →
In The Unusual Man in the Usual Place, Professor Bowers supports his argument from Punishing the Innocent by individually addressing… Continue reading →
Professor Huntington, in her Response, A House Still Divided, is sympathetic to Cox’s desire to discard the traditional dichotomy between… Continue reading →
Professor Schuck, in his Response, Immigration Law’s Organizing Principles: A Response, agrees that there is overlap in the incentives and… Continue reading →
Professor Hsu, in his Response, Saving Lives Through Administrative Law and Economics: A Response, takes issue with Graham’s support for… Continue reading →
Professor Hammitt, in his Response, Saving Lives: Benefit-Cost Analysis and Distribution, focuses on Graham’s support for using BCA as a… Continue reading →
Professor Elliott, in his Response, Only a Poor Workman Blames his Tools: On the Uses and Abuses of Benefit-Cost Analysis… Continue reading →
Professor Lawless, in his Response, The Limits of Contract as Product, challenges Bar-Gill and Warren’s initial assumption that consumer credit… Continue reading →
Professor Mann, in his Response, Unsafe at any Price?, questions Bar-Gill and Warren’s “link between the imperfection of consumer credit… Continue reading →
Professor Berg argues that Professor Tebbe’s justifications for his argument fail because religious choice is a central purpose of the… Continue reading →