Legal Realism and Legal Doctrine
The American Legal Realists did not reject doctrine, because they did not reject the idea that judges decide cases in… Continue reading →
The American Legal Realists did not reject doctrine, because they did not reject the idea that judges decide cases in… Continue reading →
Some scholars have recently suggested that textualism, intentionalism, and purposivism are more similar than is generally realized. These new “accommodationist”… Continue reading →
In this contribution to a symposium on “Legal Realism and Legal Doctrine,” I examine the role that jurisprudence plays in… Continue reading →
A symposium examining the contributions of the post-Chicago School provides an appropriate opportunity to offer some thoughts on both the… Continue reading →
Patent holdup has proven one of the most controversial topics in innovation policy, in part because companies with a vested… Continue reading →
The law’s use of the terms “reasonable” and “unreasonable” are legion and notorious. Indeed, the law’s seemingly carefree attitude in… Continue reading →
We explore the implications of the widely accepted understanding that competition law is common—or “judge-made”—law. Specifically, we ask how the… Continue reading →