Standing Outside of Article III
The U.S. Supreme Court has insisted that standing doctrine is a “bedrock” requirement only of Article III. Accordingly, both jurists… Continue reading →
The U.S. Supreme Court has insisted that standing doctrine is a “bedrock” requirement only of Article III. Accordingly, both jurists… Continue reading →
What good is Article V? The Constitution’s amendment rule renders the text inflexible, countermajoritarian, and insensitive to important contemporary constituencies.… Continue reading →
At one point or another, every law student likely encounters Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife, in which the Supreme Court… Continue reading →
The U.S. Supreme Court granted certiorari in Star Athletica, LLC v. Varsity Brands, Inc. to decide “[w]hat is the appropriate… Continue reading →
A major procedural question looms over the two marriage cases currently before the U.S. Supreme Court: Do the parties who… Continue reading →
The U.S. Supreme Court is increasingly asserting “history and tradition” as the standard to settle divisive constitutional debates on abortion,… Continue reading →
Introduction Trump v. United States is a blockbuster decision that has been reviled and celebrated by different quarters of American… Continue reading →
Now Accepting Proposals for Vol. 174 Symposium Latest in Print Latest in Online Latest Events See generally Podcast The University… Continue reading →
Congress has significantly more constitutional power than we are accustomed to seeing it exercise. By failing to make effective use… Continue reading →
According to the majority in Star Athletica v. Varsity Brands, features that are incorporated into a useful article are separable,… Continue reading →