Response

In Punitive Damages and Private Ordering Fetishism, Professor Dan Markel responds to Professor Krauss's and Professor Owen's critiques of his… Continue reading →

In Testing the Master Tools, Professor Kimberly West‐Faulcon responds to Professors Guy‐Uriel Charles and Girardeau Spann, who critiqued West‐Faulcon's article… Continue reading →

In Is Textualism Doomed?, Professor Ilya Somin counters Professor Siegel's argument that textualism is ultimately doomed to irrelevance because its… Continue reading →

In Opportunistic Textualism, Professor Lawrence Solan argues that while Professor Siegel expresses reasonable concern about the consequences of carrying textualism… Continue reading →

In Aggravating Punitive Damages, Professor David Owen applauds much of Professor Markel’s vision of how punitive damages law should operate,… Continue reading →

In “Retributive Damages” and the Death of Private Ordering, Professor Michael Krauss explores the implications of Markel's retributive damages for… Continue reading →

In Do We Care Enough About Racial Inequality? Reflections on The River Runs Dry, Professor Guy-Uriel Charles focuses on the… Continue reading →

In Doctrinal Dilemma, Professor Girardeau Spann describes West-Faulcon’s argument as both analytically sound and enticingly clever. The problem, however, is… Continue reading →

In Panel Effects, Whistleblowing Theory, and the Role of Legal Doctrine, Derek Linkous and Professor Emerson Tiller argue that Kim… Continue reading →

In Psychology, Strategy, and Behavioral Equivalence, Professor Stefanie Lindquist and Dr. Wendy Martinek recognize that Kim has created an innovative… Continue reading →