The Role of Lawmakers, Lobbyists, and Scholars in the Normative Evaluation of Timing Rules
In The Role of Lawmakers, Lobbyists, and Scholars in the Normative Evaluation of Timing Rules, Frank Fagan and Michael Faure… Continue reading →
In The Role of Lawmakers, Lobbyists, and Scholars in the Normative Evaluation of Timing Rules, Frank Fagan and Michael Faure… Continue reading →
In Constitutional Challenges to the Health Care Mandate: Based in Politics, not Law, Professor David Orentlicher expands the arguments supporting… Continue reading →
Professor Linda Simard Sandstrom responds to both Professor Fitzpatrick and Professor Marcus on the topic of class action attorneys' fees.… Continue reading →
In Law and Humanity, Michael Serota argues that legal scholarship and the humanities can and should complement each other. His… Continue reading →
In Fateful Bankers, Professor Zaring describes the strengths of Professor Omarova's article, that it does not overly rely on heavy‐handed… Continue reading →
In Financial Industry Self‐Regulation: Aspiration and Reality, Professor Schwarcz responds to Professor Omarova's recent article by applying the framework he… Continue reading →
In Attorneys' Fees and the Social Legitimacy of Class Actions, Professor David Marcus responds to Brian Fitzpatrick's proposals in Do… Continue reading →
In Weak Solutions to an Illusory Problem, Professor Steven Kaplan argues that the Bebchuk-Fried analysis is fundamentally flawed because it… Continue reading →
In The Partner‐Manager, Professor Mitchell praises their suggested executive compensation reforms and seeks to place those reforms in the larger… Continue reading →
In Exploring Panel Effects, Professor Pauline Kim revisits the panel‐effects study she advanced in Deliberation and Strategy on the United… Continue reading →