Immigration Law’s Organizing Principles: A Response
Professor Schuck, in his Response, Immigration Law’s Organizing Principles: A Response, agrees that there is overlap in the incentives and… Continue reading →
Professor Schuck, in his Response, Immigration Law’s Organizing Principles: A Response, agrees that there is overlap in the incentives and… Continue reading →
Professor Hsu, in his Response, Saving Lives Through Administrative Law and Economics: A Response, takes issue with Graham’s support for… Continue reading →
Professor Hammitt, in his Response, Saving Lives: Benefit-Cost Analysis and Distribution, focuses on Graham’s support for using BCA as a… Continue reading →
Professor Elliott, in his Response, Only a Poor Workman Blames his Tools: On the Uses and Abuses of Benefit-Cost Analysis… Continue reading →
Professor Smith argues more generally that, when it comes to the Religion Clause, “there just is not much to say… Continue reading →
Professor Bibas argues that the false guilty pleas championed in Bowers’ article would serve to undermine “the public faith and… Continue reading →
Professor Thomas proposes an even more radical change of our system that that presented by Bowers’ article—where specially-appointed magistrates, deemed… Continue reading →
Professor Wright believes that, instead of viewing “defendants” and “prosecutors” as parts of one global market, it would do better… Continue reading →