Abolish the Integration Presumption? Not Yet
Professor Bagenstos that while Professor Colker’s arguments are compelling, “[h]er article fails to establish that the IDEA’s individualized integration presumption… Continue reading →
Professor Bagenstos that while Professor Colker’s arguments are compelling, “[h]er article fails to establish that the IDEA’s individualized integration presumption… Continue reading →
In PTO’s Future: Reform or Abolition?, Professor Masur responds to the panelists from Intellectual Property Meets Administrative Law: Institutional Reform… Continue reading →
In American Corporate Governance Indices as Seen from a European Perspective, Professor Klaus Hopt provides his insights from a continental… Continue reading →
Professor Vikramaditya Khanna offers his thoughts on Bebchuk and Hamdani’s article in Corporate Governance Ratings: One Score, Two Scores, or… Continue reading →
Professor Garrett’s article on the constitutional standing of corporations employs the heuristic of “effective” litigation to unpack the lack of… Continue reading →
In Testing the Master Tools, Professor Kimberly West‐Faulcon responds to Professors Guy‐Uriel Charles and Girardeau Spann, who critiqued West‐Faulcon's article… Continue reading →
In Fateful Bankers, Professor Zaring describes the strengths of Professor Omarova's article, that it does not overly rely on heavy‐handed… Continue reading →
Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act is a doctrinal mess. Through a totality of circumstances inquiry, Section 2 has… Continue reading →
I was honored to be asked to respond to Professor Bellin's insightful article, Facebook, Twitter, and the Uncertain Future of… Continue reading →
In a terrific new article, Professor Timothy Meyer challenges this exalted view of codification, which numerous scholars since Oppenheim have… Continue reading →