Testing the Master Tools
In Testing the Master Tools, Professor Kimberly West‐Faulcon responds to Professors Guy‐Uriel Charles and Girardeau Spann, who critiqued West‐Faulcon's article… Continue reading →
In Testing the Master Tools, Professor Kimberly West‐Faulcon responds to Professors Guy‐Uriel Charles and Girardeau Spann, who critiqued West‐Faulcon's article… Continue reading →
In Fateful Bankers, Professor Zaring describes the strengths of Professor Omarova's article, that it does not overly rely on heavy‐handed… Continue reading →
Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act is a doctrinal mess. Through a totality of circumstances inquiry, Section 2 has… Continue reading →
I was honored to be asked to respond to Professor Bellin's insightful article, Facebook, Twitter, and the Uncertain Future of… Continue reading →
In a terrific new article, Professor Timothy Meyer challenges this exalted view of codification, which numerous scholars since Oppenheim have… Continue reading →
In their article, Triaging Appointed‐Counsel Funding and Pro Se Access to Justice, Professors Benjamin Barton and Stephanos Bibas argue not… Continue reading →
In tort litigation, the plaintiff compares her current situation to the reality she would have enjoyed if an injury had… Continue reading →
One of the central questions in free speech jurisprudence is what activities the First Amendment encompasses. This Article considers that… Continue reading →
To date, fracking discourse has focused on whether environmental protections under existing laws ought to be strengthened and whether the… Continue reading →
In a provocative new article, Professors Carlos Vázquez and Stephen Vladeck suggest that courts dismiss Bivens claims because judges believe… Continue reading →