Response

Professor Rosenbury’s splendid article makes an important contribution to the field of family law by drawing our attention to the… Continue reading →

Welfarism is widely employed and debated not only among philosophers, political scientists, and economists, but also increasingly among legal scholars.… Continue reading →

In a thoroughly argued article, Adler and Sanchirico defend the view that egalitarianism is concerned not merely with the equalization… Continue reading →

From way down in the dirty depths, where those of us who collect empirical data dwell unobserved and largely ignored… Continue reading →

Identifying muddles, messes, and even incoherencies in the Supreme Court’s decisions on federal jurisdiction is regrettably easy. Rescuing even part… Continue reading →

Professor Wachter has done something quite extraordinary in the long-running scholarly debate over the causes of union decline: he has… Continue reading →

That the law of evidence is the child of the jury system is not only oft-repeated but also, as a… Continue reading →

As usual, Frederick Schauer raises profound issues in his insightful essay, On the Supposed Jury-Dependence of Evidence Law. Schauer is… Continue reading →

Exactly one week before Chief Justice Warren E. Burger’s retirement was publicly announced (the White House knew in advance of… Continue reading →

This essay responds to Daniel Solove’s recent article, A Taxonomy of Privacy. I have read many of Daniel Solove’s privacy-related… Continue reading →