United States v. Booker: System Failure or System Fix?
Six years ago, the Supreme Court held in United States v. Booker that the mandatory sentencing guidelines system was unconstitutional.… Continue reading →
Six years ago, the Supreme Court held in United States v. Booker that the mandatory sentencing guidelines system was unconstitutional.… Continue reading →
When I began my career in the Pennsylvania Legislature in 1976, America's drug culture, and public awareness of drug abuse,… Continue reading →
People who commit a crime and are brought before a court to be sentenced expect to face a prison term… Continue reading →
It has been more than a decade since I began railing against the therapeutic jurisprudence movement in general and drug… Continue reading →
In 2010, fraud offenses were the third largest portion of the federal criminal docket, trailing only immigration and drug offenses.… Continue reading →
At every stage of the criminal justice process, mandatory minimums contribute to disparate impact among racial groups. They encourage policing… Continue reading →
This year, the Supreme Court is expected to review multiple cert petitions involving Nazi‐looted‐art litigation. Jennifer Anglim Kreder writes that… Continue reading →
In September 2010, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in the controversial Baycol litigation. The central question will be whether, subsequent… Continue reading →
In Astrue v. Ratliff and the Death of Strong Purposivism, Frederick Liu argues that the Supreme Court's recent decision interpreting… Continue reading →
In his Essay Original Citizenship, Josh Blackman asks what the Constitution means when it refers to “citizen[s] of the United… Continue reading →